by Jay Ball, Product
Manager, Seco Tools LLC
Micromilling compresses the challenges of maintaining tool
life into a tiny working scale at which the cutting edges of these tools
measure about the same size as the grain of the grinding wheels used to produce
them. Fortunately, micromilling typically does not create the harmonic
vibrations and chatter that often cause problems with long standard-size tools
or during heavy conventional roughing operations. Instead, the basics of maximum
micromilling tool life start long before the cut even begins, with criteria as
fundamental – and as diverse – as tool design and selection, toolholding and
material properties.
A well-balanced, rigid toolholder and the proper selection
of machine tool feeds and speeds go a long way toward maximized micromilling tool
life, as does starting with the right machine tool – and the proper cutter for
the job – in the first place. Tool geometry improves surface finish and boosts tool
life, if the tool geometry matches the specific workpiece features at hand. Additionally,
coatings provide a thermal barrier to protect the tool from wear when it
machines extremely hard materials, and the alloy chosen for the tool substrate
makes a critical difference in terms of toughness, which helps promote a
greater bond between substrate and coating.
First and foremost, of course, alloy selection translates to
greater tool life when the properties of the tool match the hardness and
abrasiveness of the part material. Substrate hardness, particularly in carbide
tools, heads the list of criteria related to tool life. Hardened tool steels
run between 48 and 65 HRc on end mills and slightly lower on inserts. A tool
needs greater hardness than the material it cuts, and some materials present
two forms of hardness, one on the surface and the other below it. A material
with a hard surface and a hard, abrasive particle, for example, presents a
special challenge where tool selection is concerned because it cuts like a
harder material than its specifications indicate.
Along with tool-selection criteria, shops also must monitor such
parameters as toolholder collet-bore cleanliness, machine stability and
consistent operating temperature to ensure best results. A poorly cleaned,
neglected toolholder can harbor chips and grit that cut tool life when they
cause wear or interfere with secure clamping. For that matter, a subpar
toolholder chosen for its price alone and not for its clamping capabilities
will cause higher runout – and high TIR is the enemy of tool life. Runout of
only about 0.0004" will cut tool life in half, so drastic toolholder
economizing rarely yields the performance necessary for optimal tool life.
In addition to tool setups, shops need to make the right
choices in programming their equipment for micromilling. Today's machine tools
offer feeds and speeds that were considered impossibly high in the past, so
it's understandable that shops want to take advantage of such full capabilities
and run as fast as possible. But the intricate geometries of many micro
machining workpieces – complex mold structures, for example – require slower
speeds to keep up with the feed rates necessary for proper chip formation.
If machine speed exceeds the point of proper chip formation,
the tool rubs instead of cuts the workpiece, pushing the material around and
roughing up the surface. Rubbing produces a visibly inferior surface finish and
makes for a difficult finish cut. With a proper chip load, the tool produces a
consistent finish that offers 50% more surface integrity, which reduces the
amount of additional work required to achieve completed parts. (Check out a
previously run Seco blog that goes into greater depth on the
importance of maintaining constant chip load.)
To maximize tool life and workpiece quality, therefore, shops
need to let feed rates determine machining speeds. As a general rule, a machine
tool should maintain its programmed feed rate for 80% of the expected cycle
time. When speeds and feeds prove unsustainable, reduced RPM and feed rate create
a sustainable working pace.
No comments:
Post a Comment